Can civil courts hear trademark suits? Supreme Court refers issue to larger bench

The Indian Express has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “No holds barred as BJP, Congress slug it out for control of Rajasthan civic bodies, Rajasthan High Court steps in.” The available feed metadata does not include a detailed description, so this entry is limited to the headline and publisher attribution. Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery and context only; readers should use the original publisher link for the complete report, f

The Indian Express has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “Ram Temple case: No discrepancies in silver bricks donation handling, SIT tells Supreme Court.” The available feed metadata does not include a detailed description, so this entry is limited to the headline and publisher attribution. Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery and context only; readers should use the original publisher link for the complete report, full sourcing and any

The Times of India has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “Courts must not interfere in cop probe: Supreme Court.” The publisher's feed describes the story as follows: <![CDATA[ Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery and context only; readers should use the original publisher link for the complete report, full sourcing and any subsequent updates.

The Hindu has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “Plea in M.P. High Court seeks closure of Ladli Behna scheme over its financial cost; notice issued to government.” The publisher's feed describes the story as follows: ₹1,500 is not enough to run a household, and there is no study to show that it is helping women create long-term financial opportunities, said Sudha Dubey Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery and context only; readers shou