Cockroach Janta Party calls for Manan Mishra's resignation as CJI slams move against NALSAR batch

Frontline has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “A 19-year acquittal gave 12 men their freedom, not their lives.” The publisher's feed describes the story as follows: They were acquitted in 2025 after the Bombay High Court found evidence of torture and fabrication. A year later, they are struggling to rebuild families, careers, and lives lost to a case that also claimed years they can never recover. Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery

Hindustan Times has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “'Who are you to question govt policy?': SC stays Madras HC order on jobs for relatives of Karur stampede victims.” The publisher's feed describes the story as follows: The Madras high court on July 27 had quashed CM Vijay's order providing government jobs to relatives of people who died in a stampede at Karur last year. Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery and context only; readers

Bar & Bench has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “Supreme Court quashes hate speech complaint, summons to Rahul Gandhi for calling Savarkar British collaborator.” The available feed metadata does not include a detailed description, so this entry is limited to the headline and publisher attribution. Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery and context only; readers should use the original publisher link for the complete report, full sourci

The Times of India has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “‘Shouldn’t govt give employment?’ Supreme Court stays HC order on jobs for Karur stampede victims' kin.” The publisher's feed describes the story as follows: <![CDATA[The Supreme Court has stayed a Madras High Court order regarding government jobs. This order had previously struck down the Tamil Nadu government's decision for stampede victims' relatives. The Supreme Court questioned the challenge to the government's