Who is a ‘distinguished jurist’, and why has India never appointed one to the Supreme Court?

Bar & Bench has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “Police can't pick and choose which accused to arrest: Delhi High Court.” The available feed metadata does not include a detailed description, so this entry is limited to the headline and publisher attribution. Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery and context only; readers should use the original publisher link for the complete report, full sourcing and any subsequent updates.

Bar & Bench has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “No basis to say homeless will be excluded from SIR: Delhi HC rejects PIL on persons displaced by demolition drives.” The available feed metadata does not include a detailed description, so this entry is limited to the headline and publisher attribution. Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery and context only; readers should use the original publisher link for the complete report, full so

EastMojo has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “Meghalaya lawyers to abstain from work on Sept 1 over Advocate General.” The publisher's feed describes the story as follows: Shillong: Lawyers across Meghalaya will abstain from judicial work from September 1 in protest against the continuation of Amit Kumar as the Advocate General of Meghalaya. The decision was taken unanimously by the Joint Executive Committee of the High Court of Meghalaya Bar Association and the Shillong

The Times of India has reported a new India-focused supreme court development: “Supreme Court slams agencies’ ‘eagerness’ to probe Abhishek’s aide.” The publisher's feed describes the story as follows: <![CDATA[ Intellectual Janata Party includes this item for public-affairs discovery and context only; readers should use the original publisher link for the complete report, full sourcing and any subsequent updates.